09.qmd (1904B)
1 --- 2 title: Cohort 9 3 --- 4 5 {{< video https://www.youtube.com/embed/HdCl_znaQLs >}} 6 7 <details> 8 9 <summary>Meeting chat log</summary> 10 ``` 11 00:10:06 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): https://steffilazerte.ca/posts/ggplot-symbols/ 12 00:10:53 Olivier Leroy: start 13 00:26:46 Derek Sollberger: In math, this would be "function composition" 14 00:26:55 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Reacted to "In math, this would ..." with 👍🏻 15 00:28:18 Derek Sollberger: Aside: this "infix" style dates back to some Polish(?) mathematicians, and may have a resurgence for some artificial intelligence algorithms 16 00:31:27 Olivier Leroy: (+ 1 2 3) 17 00:31:38 Olivier Leroy: () 18 00:36:13 Derek Sollberger: sym("x") is useful if you want R to do your Calculus homework for you, haha 19 00:36:21 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Reacted to "sym("x") is useful i..." with 😂 20 00:36:49 Olivier Leroy: “Bob” is contant bob <- 1 is a symbol no ? 21 00:37:06 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Reacted to "“Bob” is contant bob..." with 👍🏻 22 00:38:38 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Actually possibly not? 23 x <- 1 24 is.symbol(x) # FALSE 25 is.symbol(expr(x)) # TRUE 26 00:39:59 Olivier Leroy: square( 2 + 3) 27 00:40:35 Derek Sollberger: Reacted to "Actually possibly no..." with 👍 28 00:46:19 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Ah! Because it's just the x part that is the symbol, not the whole expression 😁 29 00:57:34 Olivier Leroy: `(` 30 01:02:40 Jeffrey Stevens: Got to go. See everyone next week. Thanks, Jo! 31 01:02:43 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): PEMDAS! For me it was BEDMAS! :D 32 01:03:11 Derek Sollberger: Reacted to "PEMDAS! For me it wa..." with 👍 33 01:03:29 Nagarjun: Replying to "PEMDAS! For me it ..." 34 35 BODMAS for us in Asia 36 01:03:39 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Reacted to "BODMAS for us in Asi..." with ❤️ 37 01:03:50 Steffi LaZerte (she/her): Replying to "PEMDAS! For me it wa..." 38 39 (probably why I use "brackets" rather than "parentheses") 40 01:03:55 Olivier Leroy: end 41 ``` 42 </details>